To check Oneindia News on your Mobile
go to:   http://m.oneindia.in/news/
 
  •  

We don't kill people: LeT deputy chief

MUmbai CST Station
Islamabad, Dec 6: "We don't kill people," Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT)'s deputy chief Hafiz Abdur Rehman Makki has claimed, denying that his outfit, now named the Jamaatul Dawah, was behind the Mumbai terror carnage.

He also said that India was using Pakistan 'like a punching bag' in the aftermath of the strikes that killed 172 people.

"We don't kill people. Our mission is to spread the word of Islam and Allah's message on earth. And we are not Lashker-e-Toiba, we are Jamaatul Dawah," Makki told sources in an exclusive interview in his office here.

India, as well as US experts, say LeT is one of the principal suspects for last week's Mumbai terror strikes.

The US government's Excluded Parties List System lists the LeT as one of the alternate identities of the Jamaatul Dawah.

Makki also defended his chief, Hafiz Muhammad Saeed, against Indian charges of terrorist activities and demands for his extradition.

"They (the Indian government) are using Pakistan like a punching bag to divert attention from their failure to provide security to their own people. Strange! The government, which failed to keep the terrorists away, came to know just in half-an-hour after the attack that they were from Pakistan," Makki told sources.

He said that no one from the Pakistani government or any intelligence agency had contacted his organization since the Mumbai attacks and neither "have we gone underground as reported in the media".

"The Indian mindset has not changed. They have not forgiven us for dividing the subcontinent and are hoping against hope to unite what used to be Hindustan," he said, while urging the Indian leadership to adopt a policy of coexistence.

Wearing an off-white shalwar kameez and black waistcoat, the grey bearded Makki replied to questions in the manner of a shrewd diplomat.

Unlike traditional religious leaders, he wears his hair short and keeps it uncovered.

Makki said that in the last four years, more than 5,000 people had been killed in terrorist attacks in India. "Who killed them, who killed (Mahatma) Gandhi, who killed Indira (Gandhi), Rajiv (Gandhi) and many other leaders," he asked when questioned why the LeT was being blamed for the Mumbai attacks.

"Write it down - that an independent inquiry by India's own agencies will prove that India's own people were behind the attacks," he maintained.

When asked if the LeT was still operating in Indian Kashmir, Makki was quick to respond that his organization "whatsoever has no relations with LeT except for providing them moral support".

"I challenge you to bring me a single paper of LeT which carries signature of Hafiz Muhammad Saeed or any of our workers.

Yes, we used to provide moral support to LeT but all their offices in Pakistan have been closed since the 9/11 incident," said Makki, who was a lecturer at Lahore's prestigious University of Technology and later at Makkah University in Saudi Arabia.

"What's wrong in supporting Kashmiri organizations when America has supported East Timor, Israel, Taiwan and recently Georgia and India has supported Maoists, Tamil Tigers, Mukti Bahni, and separatists in Pakistan and many other countries," said Makki, who added this title after staying in Makkah for about 14 years.

He said the LeT was one of several Kashmiri organizations that had their offices in Pakistan but now, "none of them has any office in Pakistan".

He was also not sure if the LeT was still operating in Indian Kashmir. "We haven't heard from them for long and I believe if they are still there (in Kashmir), they must have been reduced to a small organization."

Makki laughed away media reports that India may attack his organization's headquarters near Lahore, saying "any attack on our office will be attack on Pakistan".

He was of the view that American hegemonistic designs and presence in the region had "encouraged" India to issue "irresponsible" statements against its neighbours.

"America has never created problems with its immediate neighbors as it wants to keep the area peaceful but India, despite its huge economy and size, has always been at war with all its neighbors.

"It is strange that India is creating problems for its own people and the people of the region," Makki said, adding: "Are we living in a fools' paradise?"

Urging the Indian leadership to "be responsible for ensuring peace in the region", he lamented that the country's two major alliances had proved their "inability" to rule the world's largest democracy.

"They (the Congress and the BJP) are power hungry and have proved that they can go to any extent to win elections. For god's sake, be responsible and set your own house in order. Don't try to crush the minorities otherwise you may face more terrorism, not from outside but from within, from your own people," Makki maintained.

He said that India was out to harm Pakistan as its leadership had not yet accepted the division of the subcontinent.

"Their first attempt was to snatch Kashmir, the second to separate East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and now they are blocking Pakistan's waters, not only from India but from Afghanistan as well," he said, adding that India has funded a huge dam in Afghanistan that is being built on the Kabul river.

With the Kishan Ganga dam in India and the dam in Afghanistan, Pakistan would face a severe water shortage leading to drought and "another war between the two countries", Makki warned.

ANI
 
Connect with

Act fast, if not India may strike: McCain to Pak

Washington, Dec 7: US Senator and Former Presidential candidate John McCain said on Saturday, Dec 6, he believes that if Pakistan did not take necessary action against the individuals and groups linked to 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, India will conduct air strikes on select targets in Pakistan. He added that there is enough evidence of the involvement of former ISI (Inter-Services Intelligence) officers in the planning and execution of the Mumbai strikes. Senator McCain was in Islamabad with a Senate.....
User Comments
Hindu Kush 07 Dec 2008 04:11 am
Hindus in Pakistan have suffered grievously since the founding of the nation in 1947. Recently, in the southern province of Sindh, a Hindu man was accused of blasphemy and beaten to death by his co-workers. This comes at the heels of the abduction and dismemberment of a Hindu engineer. A little while earlier, the military removed 70 Hindu families from lands where they had been living since the 19th century. To this day the temples that Pakistanis destroyed in 1992 in response to the destruction of the Babri mosque in India have not been restored. Pakistan, according to many accounts, was founded as a way to protect the rights and existence of the minority Muslim population of Colonial India in the face of the larger Hindu majority. Pakistan's founder, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, is reported to have said in 1947: "In due course of time Hindus will cease to be Hindus and Muslims will cease to be Muslims - not in a religious sense for that is the personal faith of an individual- but in a political sense as citizens of one state." It is therefore a travesty of Pakistan's own founding principles that its Hindus - and not to exclude Christians and Ahmadis - have suffered so grossly. There are two levels of prejudice in Pakistan with respect to Hindus - the cultural and the legal. While it is difficult to say which one is more pernicious, cultural prejudice is certainly more difficult to uproot because it is perpetuated by religious supremacism, nationalism, stories, myth, lies, families, media, schooling and bigotry. Cultural prejudice has become part and parcel of language itself. Hindus are referred to as "na pak." Na means "un" and pak means "pure." So, Hindus are turned into the impure, or unclean. Given that the word "pak" is part of the word "Pakistan" - which means Land of the Pure - somebody's impurity suggests that they are not really Pakistani. To make matters even worse, Pakistani mullahs teach a very supremacist version of the Islamic creed, the kalima. Usually, the kalima reads simply: "There is no god but God and Muhammad is His final messenger." The version that children are taught, however, reads as follows: "The first kalima is Tayyab; Tayyab means Pak (Pure); There is no god but God and Muhammad is His final Messenger." Do you see how the word "Pak" - which denotes both purity and connects to citizenship in Pakistan - is smuggled into the Islamic creed? Since in Urdu this little ditty rhymes very effectively, this is the version of religiosity that most children repeat their entire lives. As a result, while they grow up, they psychologically equate Hindus with impurity, with uncleanliness, as not Pakistani, and therefore less than, both Islamically and as citizens. The only two parties that can begin to bring some change in this arena are the state and the liberal clerics. Last year Pakistan's prime minister did greet Hindus during Diwali and a prominent Hindu nationalist leader - who had to quit his party because of his outreach - that was born in Karachi did come back and pay respects to his birth-city. Cricket diplomacy, which began in 2004, helped a little (but not really, because the focus was on cricket and not on religion). Also, there are a few prominent Hindus here and there - one is a justice of the Supreme Court and one is the leading leg-spinner for the cricket team. Yet, as the Pakistani exile Tarek Fatah points out, Justice Bhagwandas had to take the oath on the Quran. Meanwhile, Kaneria is regularly excluded from the Pakistani cricket team's congregational Islamic prayer. As bad as the cultural prejudice is, legal prejudice is the one that must be more urgently dealt with, because it is what allows cultural prejudice to acquire institutional power. Two laws in particular have been very problematic for the Hindu community. The first one was promulgated under the 1973 constitution which made Islam the state religion of Pakistan and established a separate electorate for Muslims and non-Muslims so that Hindus could only vote for Hindu candidates. Musharraf abolished this in 2002. I think Muslims who support the idea of Islamic states around the world really need to stop and think about this for a second. It took an American-backed dictator in the year 2002 for a Muslim state to abolish unequal voting? As a wise man once said: are you kidding me? This is a deplorable commentary on the state of equality in today's Islam. The second law is the infamous blasphemy law passed under Islamist dictator Zia ul Haq in the 1980s. Designed specifically to punish the Ahmadi minority, the blasphemy law now provides convenient protection to anyone who ever wants to kill, murder, maim, beat up, mug, abduct, or punish any religious minority. All you really have to do is carry out your brutality and then point at the victim and say that he was blasphemous. This law needs to be repealed immediately: no reform, no fixing, no tweaking, but total abolishment. Efforts to repeal it under Musharraf failed in the Senate. The secular parliament in session now is probably not going to touch it unless it is told to do so by international groups (who frankly aren't really interested). The UN, EU, US, and International Council of Jurists must make some noise about repealing Pakistan's heinous blasphemy law. There are little more than three million Hindus in Pakistan (a nation of 160 million). They are still part of Pakistani life and need to be treated with respect and dignity. According to some sources, at the founding of Pakistan, Hindus comprised nearly 15% of the country's population and now number barely 2%. Many have left, many have been killed, and many have converted to other religions to protect themselves. All in all, a travesty for a state that was created with the intended purpose of protecting minorities
Nostradamus 07 Dec 2008 01:36 am
Facts of Pakistan Pakistan is waiting to kiss death. Pakistan is a land of religious fundamentalism. No academic or economic activity in pakistan. Tell me one field pakistan has achieved? Computers, Medicine, car manufacturing, Astronomy What pakistan has achieved in the last 60 years of its creation other than exporting terrorism worldwide. ( London bombers were pakistanis and Mumbai attackers were pakistanis) Most volatile nation. The Mullahs get US aid and water from India and preach hatred against Indians and westerners. Pakistan nation is a Titanic ship.
[ Post Comments ]
Oneindia  Oneindia Login