New Delhi, Mar 10: Noted economist and independent Rajya Sabha member Arjun Sengupta today advised the members of the Left parties to allow the government to pass on the increase in the global oil prices to the consumers stating that the financial health of the public sector oil companies would be wrecked otherwise.
Resuming discussions on the General Budget, the former Planning Commission Member said Finance Minister P Chidambaram need not wait for the recommendations of the Rangarajan Committee for effecting revision in the prices of petroleum products.
He said at best, the government could ''calibrate'' the pass-through in the kerosene and the LPG to protect the poor class of people.
''It is a political decision which must be taken to help finances of the public sector enterprises,'' the noted economist said.
Mr Sengupta disagreed with members of the Left parties who had argued that Mr Chidambaram should not bother too much about the Fiscal Responsibility and Management Act which enjoins the government to bring in the fiscal discipline.
He complimented the Finance Minister for reining in fiscal deficit to 3.8 per cent of the GDP. Likewise, there was a need for controlling the current account deficit. ''You cannot meet the current expenditure through borrowings,'' he added.
He said a check on the fiscal deficit and government borrowing would have a salutary impact in controlling the interest rates, which otherwise would go up.
Mr Sengupta gave full marks to the Finance Minister for a handsome increase in the savings and the investment rates. He disagreed with former Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha who had stated earlier that Mr Chidambaram did not deserve credit for improvement in savings and investment.
He said excepting the household savings, the savings in the public, corporate sector was a function of the government economic policies. These economic policies did play a role in improvement in the savings in public and private sector. ''The improvement in private sector investment shows that their confidence in the government is increasing,'' he said.
The well-known economist said the government savings had turned negative at the time of the NDA government.
Congress member Prabha Thakur supported the Budget stating it was pro-common man and the poor. She said many of the policies announced in the Budget would help the farmers and the poor.
However, BJP member Vikram Verma criticised the government for its Budget which, he said, would not help the common man. He said the UPA government could not claim the entire credit for the eight per cent GDP growth.
'' Most of the growth was left behind by the NDA government,'' he said.
Mr Sham Lal Mandal, RJD said the health sector needed more attention from the Budget. There is been a 30 per cent increase in tuberculosis, 68 per cent increase in leprosy and a 14 per cent increase in HIV cases. He said agriculture, services and trade had become the monopoly of a certain section of the population and was not broad-based.
''One section of the people are in control and there has been an increase in the gap between the rich and the poor. This has to be contained,'' Mr Mandal said.
BJP member Hema Malini pointed out that the Budget had nothing to offer for the welfare of the artists. Many of them, she pointed out, after their meteoric rise fade away into oblivion.
Congress member Alka Kshatriya said the Budget had helped the states and they were in a beneficial position vis-a-vis the Budget.
She said the Budget was poised to achieve FRBM targets by 2009.
The Budget has contained fiscal as well as revenue deficit. She lauded the Rs 1,200 crore mid-day meal scheme for the children which was one of the largest such schemes in the world.
BJD member Pramill Bohidar said the urban renewal mission's benefits have yet to trickle down to Orissa state. She also urged for more funds to develop the backward regions of the state.
Mr Sharad Joshi, SBP, said the Budget could be made more people oriented.
UNI
Resuming discussions on the General Budget, the former Planning Commission Member said Finance Minister P Chidambaram need not wait for the recommendations of the Rangarajan Committee for effecting revision in the prices of petroleum products.
He said at best, the government could ''calibrate'' the pass-through in the kerosene and the LPG to protect the poor class of people.
''It is a political decision which must be taken to help finances of the public sector enterprises,'' the noted economist said.
Mr Sengupta disagreed with members of the Left parties who had argued that Mr Chidambaram should not bother too much about the Fiscal Responsibility and Management Act which enjoins the government to bring in the fiscal discipline.
He complimented the Finance Minister for reining in fiscal deficit to 3.8 per cent of the GDP. Likewise, there was a need for controlling the current account deficit. ''You cannot meet the current expenditure through borrowings,'' he added.
He said a check on the fiscal deficit and government borrowing would have a salutary impact in controlling the interest rates, which otherwise would go up.
Mr Sengupta gave full marks to the Finance Minister for a handsome increase in the savings and the investment rates. He disagreed with former Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha who had stated earlier that Mr Chidambaram did not deserve credit for improvement in savings and investment.
He said excepting the household savings, the savings in the public, corporate sector was a function of the government economic policies. These economic policies did play a role in improvement in the savings in public and private sector. ''The improvement in private sector investment shows that their confidence in the government is increasing,'' he said.
The well-known economist said the government savings had turned negative at the time of the NDA government.
Congress member Prabha Thakur supported the Budget stating it was pro-common man and the poor. She said many of the policies announced in the Budget would help the farmers and the poor.
However, BJP member Vikram Verma criticised the government for its Budget which, he said, would not help the common man. He said the UPA government could not claim the entire credit for the eight per cent GDP growth.
'' Most of the growth was left behind by the NDA government,'' he said.
Mr Sham Lal Mandal, RJD said the health sector needed more attention from the Budget. There is been a 30 per cent increase in tuberculosis, 68 per cent increase in leprosy and a 14 per cent increase in HIV cases. He said agriculture, services and trade had become the monopoly of a certain section of the population and was not broad-based.
''One section of the people are in control and there has been an increase in the gap between the rich and the poor. This has to be contained,'' Mr Mandal said.
BJP member Hema Malini pointed out that the Budget had nothing to offer for the welfare of the artists. Many of them, she pointed out, after their meteoric rise fade away into oblivion.
Congress member Alka Kshatriya said the Budget had helped the states and they were in a beneficial position vis-a-vis the Budget.
She said the Budget was poised to achieve FRBM targets by 2009.
The Budget has contained fiscal as well as revenue deficit. She lauded the Rs 1,200 crore mid-day meal scheme for the children which was one of the largest such schemes in the world.
BJD member Pramill Bohidar said the urban renewal mission's benefits have yet to trickle down to Orissa state. She also urged for more funds to develop the backward regions of the state.
Mr Sharad Joshi, SBP, said the Budget could be made more people oriented.
UNI
Oneindia Login